There’s one question I get asked more times than I can count, in 20 years in this industry: what exactly are you buying, exactly, when you sponsor a Formula 1 team?
The honest answer is that those who ask this question are often already thinking too small.
He is thinking about the logo on the hood. To hospitality. To a press release announcing his brand as an official partner in something fast and expensive. These things exist, and they have value, but they are the surface. Underneath, something considerably more complex is happening-and understanding it changes the way you look at sports sponsorship as a whole.
The Triangle: Sports, Luxury and Automotive
Formula 1 does not fit comfortably into the category of sport. It never has. What it does occupy is the space where three industries that rarely sit at the same table converge: sports, luxury and automotive. Each of these industries has its own business logic, its own audience, its own definition of what aspiration means. Formula 1 operates at the intersection of all three, simultaneously – and this structural peculiarity is what makes it unlike anything else in the sponsorship landscape.
Sports sells emotion. It sells performance, competition, the irrational loyalty that leads an adult to lose sleep over the outcome of a race involving people he has never met. Luxury sells the opposite of the ordinary-exclusivity, manufacture, the quiet confidence of things made without compromise. Automotive sells a specific kind of ambition: the belief that engineering can extend human capabilities, that the boundary between what a machine can do and what a human being can imagine is always worth moving.
Most sports properties live inside only one of these three worlds. Formula 1 lives inside all three at the same time. The same race weekend that fills a grandstand with fans who have been saving for months also hosts dinners in paddock clubs with executives who have never attended a qualifying session in their lives-but understand instinctively what it means to be in there. The same event that produces two hours of sporting competition generates engineering data that will enter production cars within a few years.
From Visibility to Positioning: How Sponsorship is Changing in F1
For a long time, the dominant rationale for sports sponsorship was relatively simple: reach. You paid for access to an audience, measured in views and impressions, and the value of a deal was roughly proportional to the size of that audience. Formula 1 had a large audience, so sponsorship in Formula 1 was expensive. That logic still exists, but it is no longer sufficient to explain what is happening in the marketplace.
What brands are buying today is something closer to positioning. Not visibility – positioning. The distinction matters. Visibility tells your audience that you exist. Positioning tells what you stand for and who you want to be associated with. In a media ecosystem where attention is fragmented and trust is low, the latter is worth considerably more than the former.
Formula 1 offers positioning within the triangle. A technology company entering the sport is not just reaching motorsports fans – it is positioning itself within a conversation about precision engineering, incremental margins, and performance under pressure. A financial services brand is not buying space on a hood-it is associating itself with the kind of risk management and strategic thinking that wins championships. A luxury brand is not paying for logo placement — it is buying adjacency to the most time- and detail-conscious sport there is.
The Triangle Is Redesigning Sponsorship in Whole Motorsport.
This shift in logic-from reach to positioning-is the most important thing that is happening in motorsports sponsorship right now. And it is no longer exclusive to Formula 1.
What we are seeing, particularly in the last five years, is a recalibration that runs through the entire motorsport ecosystem. MotoGP, which for years was commercially undervalued relative to its true audience size and global reach, is attracting a new generation of partners who understand the positioning argument. Formula E has built its entire commercial proposition around a vertex of the triangle-the automotive and sustainability dimensions-and has found an audience of brands that did not have a natural home in traditional motorsport. The World Endurance Championship, with Le Mans at its center, has always carried the weight of luxury and automotive, and is learning to activate the sporting dimension more aggressively.
Each of these properties has its own version of the triangle, with different weights. The expertise-for a brand entering motorsports sponsorship, and for an agency supporting it-is in understanding which vertices matter most to its specific goals, and which property offers the best access to those vertices.
What the Liberty Media Era Changed
Formula 1 has accelerated this shift, partly through the commercial transformation that followed its acquisition by Liberty Media, partly through Drive to Survive, and partly by the simple fact that its audience has become younger, more global, and more diverse faster than almost anyone had anticipated. That transformation created pressure on every other motorsports property to articulate its value proposition more clearly-not just in terms of audience size, but in terms of what kind of conversation a sponsorship brings.
The triangle is Formula 1’s answer to that question. The rest of motorsport is finding its own answers. And the brands that understand this–that approach sponsorship as a positioning tool rather than a media buy–are the ones that get the most out of it.
Twenty years later, that conversation is more interesting than ever.